The ancient Greeks believed
that when they had a thought, it occurred to them as a god or goddess giving
them an order. Apollo was telling them
to be brave, or Athena was telling them to fall in love. Now people hear a commercial for sour cream
potato chips and rush out to buy them, but now they call this free will. –
Chuck Palahniuk
Isaac B. Singer was once asked
whether he believed in free will or predestination. “We have to believe in free will,” he
replied. “We have no choice.” Free will is an important concept in the
discussion of individual freedom, for if we don’t have free will, then we are
not really free agents. Almost everyone
believes that they have free will. This
makes sense because people have a deep desire to be free, to think that they
are in control of their own choices and actions. Determinism, on the other hand, is the notion
that everything that happens, including our own actions, is based on previous
events or causes. For millennia, philosophers
have argued for the existence of free will, while others have supported
determinism; still others have found middle ground supporting both positions
simultaneously. I tend to follow this
middle position, because we can see clearly that determinism is in play, at least
to some extent. There’s no question that
past events shape our current actions.
That’s not to say, though, that all of our decisions are not of our own
volition. We are able to think through
things and come to decisions, even though they are surely shaped by previous
events.
Life is like a game of
cards. The hand you are dealt is
determinism; the way play it is free will.
– Jewaharlal Nehru
My
view of free will is that it’s limited by several factors, many of which I’ve
already discussed. It’s obvious, for
example, that past events can limit our free will in the present. I believe that our personal characteristics
can be equally impactful on our free will.
There’s ample evidence to suggest that many human traits are inherited,
which implies that we may have less control over our preferences and therefore
our choices than we would like to believe. Think about our two primary personal
characteristics – intelligence and personality.
In our postmodern society, occupations are sorted primarily by
intelligence. Not everyone can be a
doctor, a lawyer, or an engineer. So, in
this important part of one’s life, one’s occupation, is at least somewhat
predetermined by one’s intelligence. And
we know that pay and status of occupations are directly related to the
intellectual requirements of the occupation.
More intelligent people tend to have higher paying and higher status
occupations and thus end up experiencing a greater degree of freedom over the
course of their lives. In this respect,
intelligence may be the biggest determinant in one’s overall freedom. Moreover, intelligent people tend to attain
higher levels of education, which helps them to gain a more profound understanding
of the world. I would go so far as to
claim that more intelligent people, on the whole, make better decisions or
choices. Their advanced intellect and
education enable them to reason through complex problems and ethical dilemmas
and to consider a wider range of possibilities.
On
the other end of the education continuum is ignorance, and it is possibly the
greatest limiter of one’s freedom.
Personal freedom is limited when individuals don’t even know what
choices or possibilities they have within their own reach. This lack of vision is common in places of
high poverty and low educational attainment.
I see it in Appalachia, where I live and work. It’s difficult for people to break the cycle
of poverty because they can’t envision any other sort of life, and after a
while, they give up hope that they can improve their lives. Education is the best hope people have of ever
breaking out of poverty, for education enables people to see beyond their own
lives to what their potential could be. And
only those who can see how their lives could be are truly free.
Only the educated are free. – Epictetus
Personality
goes a long way in determining how you react to others and how others react to
you. Whether you are an introvert or
extrovert, for instance, helps to shape your personal preferences in a number
of areas in your life. Our personality
determines whether others will like us and associate with us. People with high self-esteem tend to be more
successful. Optimists tend to have a
more positive attitude and tend to stick with problems longer. People fortunate enough to possess certain
personality traits, like optimism and an internal locus of control, are more
likely to experience greater levels of personal freedom. People with an internal locus of control
believe that what happens to them is directly attributable to the choices they
make; or, in other words, they feel that they control their own fate. Another powerful trait, hardiness, describes
individuals with great resilience and stick-to-it-ness. They don’t let setbacks hold them down, and
they tend to think that they can succeed with hard work and perseverance. It makes sense that personality traits like
these predispose individuals to experience greater degrees of freedom over a
lifetime. Although it is unclear how
much people can alter their base personality, it still makes sense for people to
accentuate their strong personality traits while trying to develop traits that
would help them experience a greater sense of personal freedom.
I agree completely. I think that people perceive free will as something more simple than what it really is. For example...if I am sitting on the couch and decide I am hungry, then simply get up in the middle of a tv show I said I wasn't going to miss, and go get a snack, is that really a good example of free will? I don't think so. If one day I decide I want to become a detective, then I must have the intelligence to complete the tasks at hand to become the desired profession that I have chosen, and also a clean background or past. So the past would play a big part in this choice. If I wanted to go another direction and choose a management position, intelligence and personality would play a big role. What if someone is an extreme introvert and they don't like to communicate with others? Personality and intelligence does play a big role in free will and it does matter what's in our pasts when it comes to certain choices.
ReplyDeleteGood thinking, Mark. The past, and other factors, has to at least constrain our free will to some extent. To what extent is still very debatable.
Delete